Bitcoin Fees Rise to $17, Network Congestion at an All Time High – Trustnodes

Bitcoin Fees Rise to $17, Network Congestion at an All Time High


Bitcoin transactions have become very expensive this morning with fees rising to $17 as demand has increased considerably with the network operating at times as high as at around 49 transactions per second.

It can barely handle 1/10th of that, at 3 transactions per second. More than 200,000 transactions, therefore, are stuck, unable to move and probably won’t move until they are dropped off in around three days.

Bitcoin congestion all-time highs.

These very high levels of demand have led to significant fee pressure, with on-chain transactions now becoming more expensive than any other comparable service, including Western Union.

$17 per transaction.

According to data from 21, the recommended fee is 0.00103960 btc, currently worth nearly $20, but whether even that will get you through depends on whether others are willing to pay as much or even more.

That makes bitcoin unusable for ordinary commerce, but while some are complaining, others might not mind what they may see as pocket change following potential stupendous gains in this parabolic recent price rise.

Traders, especially, might consider it as simply the cost of doing business, specifically arbitrage. Price premiums between western exchanges have risen to as high as $2,000 at times, but recently have narrowed somewhat to just $500.

That may be due to traders buying at the lower price exchange and selling at the higher price exchange, locking-in potentially very substantial somewhat risk free profits.

A fee of $20, $100 or even $1,000 might seem like a bargain to them, but why anyone should pay such amounts to around 10 individuals known as miners when they are already paid billions through minting bitcoins does remain a bit of a mystery.

That ship, however, has sailed, with the scalability debate ended this November. As such, bitcoiners have to just keep on waiting for Lightning, which apparently has been launched but somehow does not seem to be making any difference.


Comments (1)

  1. While the Lightning Network is a much needed step to address the currently high fees, I have some long-term concerns about relying on it. The thing is, the Bitcoin network was designed such that less coins are minted over time so that the miners can gradually transition to being paid in fees. Using the lightning network to open channels through which several transactions can flow without fees circumvents that and can actually lead to higher average fees for everyone else.

    Personally, I think we should be using a dynamic block size that increases and shrinks according to the needs of the network, within a ceiling value set by the average capability of the nodes. If node operators were rewarded by the network the way miners currently are according to their bandwidth they would have a financial incentive to scale up their capabilities leading to the network as a whole scaling up. That would ensure that transactions everywhere confirm cheaply, and the lightning network can still be of use for quicker in person transactions at stores where you don’t want to wait more than a few moments for the transaction to confirm.

    At first glance it would appear that miners would be harmed by less fees, but in reality it would benefit miners because having the capability to confirm more transactions faster means getting paid more overall.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>